I left work at 4 and went to Pleasant Hill
like I do every day but on this day for whatever reason, I had trouble finding
a locker. I went through the whole area to
look and barely made the train. When I
finally found a seat and had rested up I called the CSR and tweeted about it
too but in the end I heard nothing. This
was the first time that this had ever happened and I think that it was no
coincidence that it happened that day. I
think that at the end of the summer people return from their vacations and
start classes again and want to start off on the right foot. I know that this day was special because the
incident didn’t happen again.
During that period I had been trying to
get people to come to Happy Hour at Zeitgest.
I had met a lot of people via Twitter and I wanted to get to know them. The whole affair was the result of a post I
made about the Car Free Happy Hour last July.
A number of people had mentioned wanting to go. About three weeks later I noted that I had contacted
a bunch of people and made plans for the 28th.
Those that were able to come were a broad
array of personalities in business, law, data, art and design. We had gotten to know each other through the
local car free scene and social media. I
noted that each one was relatively well connected in their various areas and
had all garnered a modest following among their peers. We had a pitcher of delicious dark beer and
said hello to a number of other people—geographers, cyclists—from other tables
that we knew. I learned about SF2G (aka
San Francisco to Google). I also heard
about the progress being made on cycling infrastructure in Oakland, commuting
to Diablo Valley College for work and Google MapsGL.
When ever I do this kind of thing I
always take a step back afterwards to ask, “What happened?” In all, the effort to organize the event was
difficult. While I do inevitably fret about
the experience, the effect of any successful event can leave me feeling good
about myself.
I wrote another post about car free
stuff about a week later when I went to a dinner put on by YPT a Madre Mia in
the Mission. We had all paid in advance. We introduced ourselves and had a general discussion
of our jobs. For instance there were
about 5 people from MTA, someone from the Bicycle Coalition, a car share
person, a geodata person and a person from Code for America. The meal was good. I talked to people about jobs and plans for grad
school.
The speaker at the meal was an administrative
aide that talked about how bikes need to be “cool” and that women need to ride
more. There was also some discussion of how
difficult it can be to build overhead wires for transit because the engineers
are not available. When the conversation
turned to local ballot measures the conversation became especially contentious. While some decided to keep their political
views to themselves others were especially outspoken. However, I noticed that while it might have
seemed that people’s opinions were either for or against a particular measure
there was subtle nuance to them. For
instance, I noted that one person was especially strident in people keeping the
same opinion and another was especially well versed in managing opinions.
I started writing this piece on 082714. It is part of an occasional series
chronicling my life. This Notebook Analysis series is meant
to be contemporaneous piece developed as an agglomeration of my notebook pages.
In each of these posts I used my notes to develop my recent thoughts.
No comments:
Post a Comment